File Naming Standards
When you may access a file multiple times, the effort required to
do so is greatly simplified by naming the file to facilitate finding it when
needed. Success is largely determined by two attributes of the file name:
uniqueness and meaningfulness. The name must be unique enough that you aren't
presented with a passel of candidates to choose from when you try to search for
it. The name must be meaningful, so that you can enter successful search
criteria. I think we have all seen the downside of these attributes being
handled poorly, when we search for information on web search engines. Better
results are achieved with well-named and well-tagged documents.
Files used in the course of
running a business are even more critical to be described properly as it can
cost valuable time and money to access them. There is a site where they have
posted and discussed this very question at: http://www.whatdoiknow.org/archives/000442.shtml
Does your business have a DAM
system or document management system? This can be a great help in this respect,
particularly if it supports versioning, as this can also eliminate duplicate
files and provide document history for governance purposes. You will still have
similar issues with naming but most DAM systems have decent search engines.
Naming standards can be very
different depending on what you do. For example, if you produce catalogs or
flyers as a repeat business for a client and there is some reuse of assets, it
probably makes most sense to inherit at least some of the name from the client
i.e. using product SKU as part of the name. If you are constantly doing new and
custom work, you are probably better off using a client-docket-page-position
style naming standard and organizational hierarchy as you might use in a legal
or medical practice or a publishing environment.
Our company sells DAM systems
and we actually offer a 1 day consultation that we call The DAM Primer to
address these issues. We call it a consultation as opposed to a course, because
it really depends on the client needs as to what makes sense as far as a naming
standard. We usually discuss a couple of common methods and then listen to the
client to help develop a standard appropriate for their workflow. We also
address metadata in this consultation. We recently did this consultation with a
library, and learned almost as much as we taught.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home